Abstract Preview

Here is the abstract you requested from the IMAPS_2016 technical program page. This is the original abstract submitted by the author. Any changes to the technical content of the final manuscript published by IMAPS or the presentation that is given during the event is done by the author, not IMAPS.

A Deeper Understanding on the Motion Behaviors of Wire during Ultrasonic Wedge-Wedge Bonding Process
Keywords: wedge-wedge bonding, relative motion, thin layer coating
Two interfaces exist within the ultrasonic wire bonding domain - the wire/tool interface and the wire/substrate interface. The motion behaviors at the wire/tool interface, which could make the bonding mechanism even more complex, have been rarely investigated. In spite of many arguments on the occurrence of a relative motion, the relative motion between the wire and the bonding tool for thick wire bonding has been detected via high speed videos (Long et al., 2015). Nevertheless, the motion behaviors at the wire/tool interface are assumed to be more complex than a simple relative motion between two rigid bodies as the aluminum wire is much softer than the bonding tool made of tungsten carbide. Even though some scratches are able to be observed on the surface of the wire after bonding, very limited information can be revealed due to the asymmetric plastic deformation. In the present study, a thin oxide layer was coated onto the surface of the aluminum wire and the changes of the layer were used to analyze the motion behaviors. To test the influence of the layer on the bond quality, an aluminum oxide layer with a thickness of 200 nm was first deposited on the wire. A couple of bonds with the coated and uncoated wires were then made under the same process parameters and shear tests were conducted. The result showed an insignificant difference between the shear forces of the two different kinds of bonds, which means the influence of the layer on the bond quality is ignorable. Then different oxide layers (Al2O3 and ZrO2) with smaller thicknesses were coated. The coated wires were bonded for 20 ms, 30 ms, 40 ms and 50 ms under the same normal force and ultrasonic power settings. Through energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopical (EDXS) observation, it was found that most oxides were removed from the regions where the wire contacted the fillets of the bonding tool within 30 ms. While after 50 ms, the oxide layer on other regions was either removed or reduced. Many oxides are found to be transported to the outer regions which are close to the fillets contact region. In addition, after hundreds of usage cycles, the bonding tool was also analyzed by EDXS and the result showed oxide accumulations on the fillets part as well as on the other contact perimeter regions. These results indicate that complex relative motion behaviors between the wire and the tool existed. Both the continuous plastic deformation and the ultrasonic vibration induced relative motions. The impact of the continuous plastic deformation dominated the relative motion in the first ~20 ms while the relative motion in the latter stage was dominated by the vibration. The relative motion amplitude at the fillets contact region is higher than that at the other contact perimeter region and the amplitude at the central area is the lowest. The wedgewedge bonding has a very high self-cleaning efficiency both at the wire/tool interface and the wire/substrate interface.
Yangyang Long, Research Assistant
Leibniz University Hannover
Hanover , Lower Saxony

  • Amkor
  • ASE
  • Canon
  • Corning
  • EMD Performance Materials
  • Honeywell
  • Indium
  • Kester
  • Kyocera America
  • Master Bond
  • Micro Systems Technologies
  • MRSI
  • Palomar
  • Promex
  • Qualcomm
  • Quik-Pak
  • Raytheon
  • Rochester Electronics
  • Specialty Coating Systems
  • Spectrum Semiconductor Materials
  • Technic